July 24, 2026, 7:31 AM · Data Story · 10 min read
For continuously taxed imports, 80% to 100% of Friday's new duty matches the old surcharge
At 12:01 a.m. Eastern on July 24, the temporary 10% Section 122 surcharge reached its stated endpoint as new Section 301 duties of up to 12.5% took effect. For an otherwise identical import taxed under both policies, 80% to 100% of the new duty numerically matches the old charge, but the available public data cannot support that range for the entire import basket.
By Cumulant Research
Hover or tap an underlined term to see its definition.

The quick version
- When the old and new additional duties are both 10%, the new duty fully matches the old exposure.
- When an import moves from a 10% surcharge to a 12.5% duty, $10 of every $12.50 matches the old exposure, an 80% match.
- A positive duty reduced by an MFN-linked cap still produces a match share between 80% and 100%.
- The range applies only to otherwise identical imports taxed under both policies, not to previously exempt goods that became taxable.
- This calculation measures written tariff exposure, not collections, prices, market reaction or the policy's effect on forced labor.
Figure
On $100 of value, $10 of a $12.50 new duty matches the old surcharge
Additional duties only, excluding ordinary MFN and other tariffs
The chart compares the full old duty, the full new duty and the matching portion. The new duty exceeds the matching portion by $2.50. The scale begins at zero, and the example is an uncapped 12.5% case rather than an average shipment.
Source: Cumulant Research calculation from the Section 122 proclamation and USTR final notice: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/full_text/html/2026/02/25/2026-03824.html; https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/Press/Releases/2026/FLIP%20301%20Investigation%20Final%20Action%20FRN%207-23-26%20FINAL.pdf · dollars per $100 of customs value · July 23-24, 2026
Why it matters
The July 24 policy switch changes the legal basis and coverage of US import duties even where much of the written charge is numerically unchanged. Importers, customs advisers and exposed industries must examine product, origin, exemption and transit rules rather than assume that the old 10% surcharge simply became the new tariff. The analysis also cautions investors and consumers against treating similar headline rates as proof of similar prices, profits or economic effects.
The answer is a range, but only for continuously taxed imports
The legal texts place both sides of the switch at 12:01 a.m. Eastern on Friday, July 24. The Section 122Section 122Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 permits temporary import restrictions for serious international-payments problems; the February 2026 proclamation used it for a 10% surcharge lasting no more than 150 days without an act of Congress. Source: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/full_text/html/2026/02/25/2026-03824.html proclamation says its 10% surcharge continues through that time. USTR's final notice says the new Section 301Section 301Section 301 is a trade-law authority under which USTR may investigate certain foreign practices and respond with measures such as tariffs. Source: https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF11346 duties apply to covered products entered for consumption, or withdrawn from a warehouse for consumption, on or after that time. Sources: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/full_text/html/2026/02/25/2026-03824.html and https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/Press/Releases/2026/FLIP%20301%20Investigation%20Final%20Action%20FRN%207-23-26%20FINAL.pdf
The narrow question is not whether the two policies are legally equivalent. They are not: one arose under Section 122 to address stated international-payments problems, while the other arose from Section 301 investigations into failures to impose and effectively enforce forced-labor import prohibitions. The question is simply how many dollars of the new written dutydutyA duty is a charge imposed on an imported good; this article uses duty and tariff interchangeably. are no greater than the old written duty on otherwise identical import characteristics. Sources: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/full_text/html/2026/02/25/2026-03824.html and https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/Press/Releases/2026/FLIP%20301%20Investigation%20Final%20Action%20FRN%207-23-26%20FINAL.pdf
Finding
For an entry stratumentry stratumEntry stratum is this article's comparison unit: the same origin, product classification, customs value, trade-program claim, product use, Section 232 treatment and relevant entry or transit status. that owed the old 10% surcharge and owes a positive new duty no greater than 12.5%, the match sharematch shareMatch share is matching exposure divided by the new duty, and it is undefined when the new duty is zero. is between 80% and 100%.
Figure
On $100 of value, $10 of a $12.50 new duty matches the old surcharge
Additional duties only, excluding ordinary MFN and other tariffs
The chart compares the full old duty, the full new duty and the matching portion. The new duty exceeds the matching portion by $2.50. The scale begins at zero, and the example is an uncapped 12.5% case rather than an average shipment.
Source: Cumulant Research calculation from the Section 122 proclamation and USTR final notice: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/full_text/html/2026/02/25/2026-03824.html; https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/Press/Releases/2026/FLIP%20301%20Investigation%20Final%20Action%20FRN%207-23-26%20FINAL.pdf · dollars per $100 of customs value · July 23-24, 2026
The arithmetic starts with the smaller duty
Consider the same hypothetical $100 of customs valuecustoms valueCustoms value is generally the price paid or payable for an imported product, excluding US import duties and international freight, insurance and related transportation charges. Source: https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/reference/definitions/index.html under both schedules. If the old surcharge applied, the old additional dutyadditional dutyAn additional duty is a tariff charged on top of the ordinary tariff that normally applies to the product. Source: https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/Press/Releases/2026/FLIP%20301%20Investigation%20Final%20Action%20FRN%207-23-26%20FINAL.pdf was $10. If the new rate is also 10%, the new duty is $10 and all of it matches the old exposure. If the new rate is 12.5%, the new duty is $12.50. The matching amount remains $10, leaving $2.50 above the old charge. The match share is therefore $10 divided by $12.50, or 80%. The official rate inputs come from the proclamation and final notice: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/full_text/html/2026/02/25/2026-03824.html and https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/Press/Releases/2026/FLIP%20301%20Investigation%20Final%20Action%20FRN%207-23-26%20FINAL.pdf
In symbols, let V be customs value, S the old surcharge and N the new duty. For a continuously taxed stratum, S = 0.10V and N = rV, where the positive new rate r cannot exceed 0.125 under this action. Matching exposureMatching exposureMatching exposure is the smaller of the old and new duties on the same entry stratum. is the smaller of S and N. When r is 10% or lower, the entire new duty matches. When r lies above 10% and no higher than 12.5%, the match share is 0.10 divided by r, reaching its lowest value of 0.80 at 12.5%. Source for the rate boundaries: https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/Press/Releases/2026/FLIP%20301%20Investigation%20Final%20Action%20FRN%207-23-26%20FINAL.pdf
The MFN-linked caps do not break the range. For products of the European Union or Taiwan, the final action reduces the Section 301 duty so the MFN rateMFN rateThe most-favored-nation rate is the ordinary non-preferential tariff generally applied to imports from World Trade Organization members, apart from special trade-agreement rates. Source: https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/glossary_e/mfn_tariff_e.htm plus the new duty reaches 10%, and sets the new duty to zero when the MFN rate is already at least 10%. For products of Japan, South Korea or Switzerland, the equivalent ceiling is 12.5%. Any positive capped duty is therefore no greater than 12.5%, preserving the 80% to 100% conditional range. Source: https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/Press/Releases/2026/FLIP%20301%20Investigation%20Final%20Action%20FRN%207-23-26%20FINAL.pdf
Figure
Six entry-level outcomes sit behind the tariff switch
The headline finding covers only rows with a 10% old duty and a positive new duty
| Outcome | Old duty | New duty | Match share | Net change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed 10% new rate | 10% | 10% | 100% | 0 points |
| Fixed 12.5% new rate | 10% | 12.5% | 80% | +2.5 points |
| Positive duty under 10% MFN cap | 10% | >0% to 10% | 100% | More than -10 to 0 points |
| Positive duty under 12.5% MFN cap | 10% | >0% to 12.5% | 80% to 100% | More than -10 to +2.5 points |
| Previously exempt, now taxed | 0% | >0% to 12.5% | 0% | Increase equals new rate |
| New duty is zero | 0% or 10% | 0% | Not applicable | 0 or -10 points |
For a positive new duty, matching exposure is the smaller of the old and new duties. A zero new duty has no match share because its denominator is zero.
Source: Cumulant Research calculation from the official rates, caps and exemptions: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/full_text/html/2026/02/25/2026-03824.html; https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/Press/Releases/2026/FLIP%20301%20Investigation%20Final%20Action%20FRN%207-23-26%20FINAL.pdf · percent of customs value, except match share
The switch followed a short investigation running beside a fixed legal clock
The Section 122 proclamation made the temporary surcharge effective on February 24, 2026, and stated that Section 122 permits such a surcharge for no more than 150 days unless Congress extends it. USTR initiated the separate set of 60 Section 301 investigations on March 12, made its findings on June 2 and published its proposed action on June 5. The President directed the final action on July 23, one day before the new duties became applicable. Sources: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/full_text/html/2026/02/25/2026-03824.html; https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/Press/Releases/2026/FLIP%20301%20Investigation%20Final%20Action%20FRN%207-23-26%20FINAL.pdf; https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2026/07/actions-by-the-united-states-in-the-investigations-under-section-301-of-the-trade-act-of-1974-of-the-acts-policies-and-practices-of-60-economies-related-to-the-failure-of-each-economy-to-impose-and/
Figure
The temporary surcharge and the new investigation converged on July 24
2026-02-24
Section 122 surcharge begins
A temporary 10% surcharge takes effect, subject to stated exceptions.
2026-03-12
USTR opens 60 investigations
USTR initiates investigations concerning forced-labor import prohibitions.
2026-06-02
USTR makes actionability findings
The agency determines that the investigated practices are actionable under Section 301.
2026-06-05
Proposed action is published
Proposed tariffs and exemptions enter the public-comment process.
2026-07-23
Final action is issued
The President directs the final rate structure, and USTR issues its notice.
2026-07-24
The 12:01 a.m. switch
The new Section 301 duties become applicable as the Section 122 measure reaches its stated endpoint.
Source: Section 122 proclamation and USTR final notice: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/full_text/html/2026/02/25/2026-03824.html; https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/Press/Releases/2026/FLIP%20301%20Investigation%20Final%20Action%20FRN%207-23-26%20FINAL.pdf
The timing explains why the rates invite comparison, but timing alone does not establish that one policy caused the other or that the new policy will produce the same economic effects. It establishes only that the two written schedules changed at the same stated time.
The exemption lists prevent a whole-basket shortcut
The old surcharge did not cover every import. The proclamation excluded listed products and circumstances, including pharmaceuticals and pharmaceutical ingredients, specified goods subject to Section 232Section 232Section 232 is a separate authority covering imports determined to threaten national security; specified products subject to Section 232 measures are excluded from the duties studied here. Sources: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/full_text/html/2026/02/25/2026-03824.html and https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/Press/Releases/2026/FLIP%20301%20Investigation%20Final%20Action%20FRN%207-23-26%20FINAL.pdf measures, qualifying duty-free goods of Canada and Mexico, and a short transit window. Source: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/full_text/html/2026/02/25/2026-03824.html
The new Section 301 action also contains extensive exemptions, including a transit exceptiontransit exceptionA transit exception protects qualifying goods already on their final journey before a new tariff's start time from that new tariff. Source: https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/Press/Releases/2026/FLIP%20301%20Investigation%20Final%20Action%20FRN%207-23-26%20FINAL.pdf, Chapter 98 treatment, specified product exclusions, certain pharmaceutical-use exclusions, Section 232-related exclusions and qualifying duty-free goods of Canada and Mexico. Its rules are not identical to the Section 122 list. For example, the final notice explains that exemptions for certain chemical products were limited to pharmaceutical applications rather than every application. Source: https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/Press/Releases/2026/FLIP%20301%20Investigation%20Final%20Action%20FRN%207-23-26%20FINAL.pdf
That difference creates more than one path through the switch. A stratum taxed under both rules falls within the headline's 80% to 100% range. A stratum exempt before but taxed now has a 0% match because none of its new duty was previously present. A stratum with a zero new duty contributes nothing to the denominatordenominatorThe denominator is the quantity beneath the division line, which in the match-share calculation is the new duty.. These cases must be classified before anyone can calculate an aggregate result.
The public monthly data stop short of a defensible aggregate
The Census merchandise-import files are detailed but aggregated. The published record layout includes a 10-digit HTS codeHTS codeAn HTS code identifies a product in the US tariff schedule, with eight digits defining a legal tariff line and ten digits adding statistical detail. Source: https://www.usitc.gov/tariff_affairs/about_hts.htm, country of origin, country subcode, customs district, rate provisionrate provisionA rate provision is a Census code indicating whether a trade record used an ordinary, preferential, Chapter 99 or other duty treatment. Source: https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/reference/codes/rp.html, statistical month, customs value, dutiable value and calculated dutycalculated dutyCalculated duty is Census's estimate based on tariff-schedule rates and does not necessarily equal the amount ultimately paid. Source: https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/reference/definitions/index.html. Census's API likewise publishes commodity, country, value and calculated-duty variables. Sources: https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/data/IMDB.html; https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/reference/products/im145.html; https://api.census.gov/data/timeseries/intltrade/imports/hs/variables/.html
Those fields can support a strong first-pass map from country and product to tariff treatment. They do not, however, list every condition in the final notice. In particular, the cited general monthly layout does not identify whether every affected chemical was entered for a pharmaceutical application, nor does it provide the precise loading and entry timestamps needed to test the July 24-28 transit exception shipment by shipment. Source for those legal conditions: https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/Press/Releases/2026/FLIP%20301%20Investigation%20Final%20Action%20FRN%207-23-26%20FINAL.pdf
Figure
Public monthly trade records omit some conditions needed for the legal match
Fields listed in the Census import file, API and record layout
| Condition | Listed in public monthly layout? | Analytical consequence |
|---|---|---|
| Country and 10-digit HTS code | Yes | Supports country-product mapping |
| Rate provision and country subcode | Yes | Helps identify ordinary and preferential treatment |
| Customs value and calculated duty | Yes | Supports estimates, subject to Census cautions |
| Pharmaceutical application | No general field listed | Cannot resolve every use-limited exemption |
| Exact final-mode loading and entry times | No general field listed | Cannot resolve every July transit exception |
The cited public layout aggregates records by fields including product, origin, rate provision and month. It does not list general fields for pharmaceutical use or the precise loading and entry timestamps required by the new notice's transit exception.
Source: US Census Bureau merchandise-trade files, API variables and record layout: https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/data/IMDB.html; https://api.census.gov/data/timeseries/intltrade/imports/hs/variables/.html; https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/reference/products/im145.html
Calculated duty also needs caution. Census says its calculated-duty estimates do not necessarily reflect the amount actually paid and can be overstated or understated in specified circumstances. That warning rules out treating the public field as a clean ledger of cash collections. Source: https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/reference/definitions/index.html
A sensitivity test shows why 80% is not a basket-wide floor
The aggregate formula is straightforward once every entry stratum has been classified. Add the smaller of the old and new duties across all strata, then divide by total new duty. The complication is not the division. It is determining which goods belonged in each old and new legal category.
Let q represent the share of new-duty dollars coming from strata that paid no Section 122 surcharge. Let c represent the weighted match share among strata taxed under both rules. The aggregate match share is c multiplied by 1 minus q. If q is zero, the aggregate remains between 80% and 100%. If q is positive, the aggregate can fall below 80%. The sensitivity chart shows the arithmetic without pretending that the public files reveal q.
Figure
Newly taxed goods can pull whole-basket overlap below 80%
Sensitivity scenarios only, not estimates of actual imports
Let q be the share of new-duty dollars arising from strata that paid no Section 122 surcharge. Let c be the weighted match share among continuously taxed strata, ranging from 80% to 100%. The whole-basket result is c multiplied by 1 minus q. Midpoints use c = 90%. The q values are transparent scenarios, not measured import shares.
Source: Cumulant Research calculation using the official 10% and 12.5% rates: https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/Press/Releases/2026/FLIP%20301%20Investigation%20Final%20Action%20FRN%207-23-26%20FINAL.pdf · match share of new duty, percent
The scenarios are not forecasts. They demonstrate why a correct entry-level result cannot be promoted into a claim about all covered imports without measuring the new-duty dollars generated by previously exempt strata.
What the result says, and what it does not
The finding describes statutory exposurestatutory exposureStatutory exposure is the duty implied by the written tariff rules before refunds, enforcement differences or changes in importer behavior.: the additional duty implied by two written tarifftariffA tariff is a customs duty on imported merchandise, commonly calculated as a percentage of value or as a fixed amount per unit. Source: https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/reference/definitions/index.html schedules for otherwise identical import characteristics. It does not estimate how importers will change suppliers, quantities, classifications, shipment timing or use of trade programs.
It also does not measure pass-throughpass-throughPass-through is the share of a tariff change that appears in prices paid by importers, retailers or consumers rather than being absorbed elsewhere.. A $2.50 increase in written duty on a hypothetical $100 entry does not by itself show whether the importer, foreign producer, retailer or consumer ultimately bears that amount. Measuring that economic effecteconomic effectAn economic effect is a change in outcomes such as import volumes, business costs, consumer prices, employment or production. would require observed prices, contracts, margins and quantities after the switch.
A market reactionmarket reactionA market reaction is a change in traded asset prices, such as stocks, bonds or currencies, following news. would be a movement in securities, currencies or other traded prices following the announcement. This analysis uses no market-price data and makes no claim about such a reaction.
Finally, USTR states that the Section 301 action is intended to address investigated failures involving forced-labor import prohibitions. The 80% to 100% overlap calculation cannot show whether the tariffs reduce forced labor, improve enforcement abroad or eliminate the practices USTR found actionable. Those are causal questions requiring later evidence. Source for USTR's stated action and rationale: https://ustr.gov/about/policy-offices/press-office/press-releases/2026/july/ustr-takes-action-forced-labor-section-301-investigations
Bottom line
For continuously taxed, otherwise identical imports, the numerical match is 80% to 100%. For the entire import basket, the evidence available here does not support a single percentage.
What to watch
- Entry-level customs data showing how much new-duty revenue comes from goods previously exempt under Section 122.
- Importer changes to sourcing, classification, shipment timing and use of trade programs.
- Observed price, margin and quantity data that could identify who ultimately bears the duties.
- USTR guidance, exclusion changes or legal challenges affecting the new Section 301 action.
How we did this
- We limited the question to otherwise identical entry strata that paid the 10% Section 122 surcharge and owe a positive Section 301 duty after the switch. This avoids treating changes in exemption status as continuous exposure.
- We took the old 10% rate and its endpoint from the Section 122 proclamation: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/full_text/html/2026/02/25/2026-03824.html
- We took the new 10%, 12.5%, MFN-capped and zero-duty outcomes, along with exemptions and the transit rule, from USTR's final notice: https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/Press/Releases/2026/FLIP%20301%20Investigation%20Final%20Action%20FRN%207-23-26%20FINAL.pdf
- For each stratum, we defined matching exposure as the smaller of the old and new additional duties. Match share equals matching exposure divided by the new duty.
- For a positive new rate no greater than 10%, the share is 100%. For a rate above 10% and no greater than 12.5%, the share is 10% divided by the new rate, producing a minimum of 80% at 12.5%.
- For a whole-basket calculation, the correct numerator is the sum of the smaller old-or-new duty across strata, and the denominator is total new duty. Strata with no old surcharge but a positive new duty can reduce the result below 80%.
- We reviewed the Census merchandise-import page, API variable list and IM145 record layout to determine which classification fields are publicly listed: https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/data/IMDB.html; https://api.census.gov/data/timeseries/intltrade/imports/hs/variables/.html; https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/reference/products/im145.html
- Sensitivity-chart values are deterministic applications of R = c x (1, q). They are scenarios, not empirical estimates. Values are rounded to one decimal where necessary.
- All chart axes begin at zero where an axis applies, and tables and charts are limited to no more than six rows or events.
What this cannot establish
- The analysis compares written additional-duty rates, not confidential customs entries or importer payment records.
- The public monthly files aggregate transactions and do not list every product-use or shipment-timing condition needed to reproduce the legal classification of every entry.
- Census warns that calculated-duty estimates do not necessarily equal duties ultimately paid: https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/reference/definitions/index.html
- The calculation holds customs value and entry characteristics fixed, so it does not model changes in trade volumes, suppliers, classification, timing or exemption claims.
- No whole-basket match share is estimated because the share of new-duty dollars arising from previously exempt strata was not established.
- The analysis does not estimate pass-through, consumer prices, business margins, market reaction, collections, refunds or enforcement outcomes.
- The calculation cannot determine whether the Section 301 action causes stronger forced-labor enforcement or reduces the production or trade of forced-labor goods.
- The legal treatment of a specific shipment can depend on facts and tariff provisions not captured in this article, so the analysis is not customs or legal advice.
This is AI-assisted analysis under stated assumptions; it is not investment advice or a price target. Figures are as of the publication date and trace to the cited sources; markets and disclosures change.
Sources
- 01Imposing a Temporary Import Surcharge To Address Fundamental International Payments Problems, Federal RegisterPrimary
- 02Notice of Actions in Section 301 Investigations Related to Forced-Labor Import Prohibitions, Office of the United States Trade RepresentativePrimary
- 03Actions in the Section 301 Investigations of 60 Economies, The White HousePrimary
- 04USTR Takes Action in Forced Labor Section 301 Investigations, Office of the United States Trade RepresentativePrimary
- 05Section 301, Failure to Impose and Effectively Enforce a Prohibition on Forced-Labor Imports, Office of the United States Trade RepresentativePrimary
- 06Merchandise Trade Imports, US Census BureauData
- 07Imports HS API Variables, US Census BureauData
- 08IM145 and IA245 Import Record Layout, US Census BureauData
- 09Types of Duty Rate Provision Codes, US Census BureauData
- 10International Trade Definitions, US Census BureauData
- 11Description of the International Trade Statistical Program, US Census BureauData
- 12About the Harmonized Tariff Schedule, US International Trade CommissionPrimary
- 13Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, Congressional Research ServiceSecondary
- 14MFN Tariff Glossary, World Trade OrganizationPrimary
Related
The 10% Wall That Sunsets Itself
A universal 10% import surcharge dies by operation of law at 12:01 a.m. on July 24, with no vote and no signature. Yale's tariff data shows the average rate Americans actually pay steps down only about 2 points, from 11.8% to 9.7%, because permanent statutes were quietly rebuilt underneath it. Whether July 24 delivers a real, temporary dip or almost nothing turns on a sequencing detail Yale has not pinned down.

The 17-Day Tariff Cliff: Why the Replacement May Not Be in Force When the Old Tariff Dies
When the 10% Section 122 global tariff automatically expires at 12:01 a.m. on 24 July 2026, the forced-labor Section 301 tariffs meant to replace it would have to clear their entire post-hearing stage in about 17 days, roughly one-third of the 50 days that stage took in the 2018 China action. Our finding: a legal-instrument gap is likely, but what importers actually pay barely moves, because older tariff layers hold the effective rate near 8 percent, far above the 2.3 percent paid before this escalation.

At 4 p.m., Brazil's final tariff list was missing. The concentration share was unknowable.
USTR had identified July 15 as its statutory deadline for responsive action, and Reuters reported that a 25% tariff announcement was expected that day. At 4 p.m. Eastern Time, no final action or product list was visible on the official pages checked, leaving the requested supply-concentration share impossible to calculate honestly. [USTR](https://ustr.gov/about/policy-offices/press-office/press-releases/2026/june/ustr-section-301-determination-brazils-unreasonable-acts-policies-and-practices), [Reuters](https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/brazil-braces-new-us-tariffs-washington-broadens-trade-push-sources-say-2026-07-15/), [USTR case page](https://ustr.gov/trade-topics/enforcement/section-301-investigations/section-301-brazils-acts-policies-and-practices-related-digital-trade-and-electronic-payment), [Federal Register](https://www.federalregister.gov/public-inspection/2026/07/15)

A 'Forced-Labor' Tariff Whose Discounts Went to the Countries With More Forced Labor
On June 2, 2026, USTR proposed a forced-labor tariff on 60 economies, splitting them into a 10% and a 12.5% tier. Rank the major trading partners by how much forced labor they actually have and the rate does not follow: Pakistan, the highest-prevalence economy on the list, got the 10% discount, while India, the second-highest, pays 12.5%, and China is taxed at the same 12.5% as low-prevalence Norway. What the rate tracks is USTR's own stated test, whether a country has a forced-labor import-ban law or signed a reciprocal-trade deal, not the amount of forced labor. It reads like the struck-down IEEPA tariff wall being rebuilt on court-tested authority under a human-rights label.
