Skip to content
NewsroomLabor

September 2, 2026, 2:00 PM · Data Story · 10 min read

ADP estimates a 7,000-job August decline outside education and health

[ADP's August estimate](https://mediacenter.adp.com/2026-09-02-ADP-National-Employment-Report-Private-Sector-Employment-Increased-by-38,000-Jobs-in-August) shows education and health adding 45,000 jobs while the other private-industry groups combined lost 7,000. A historical baseline test finds no forecasting advantage in this pattern, making it evidence of unusually narrow job growth rather than proof of a broad labor-market contraction.

By Cumulant Research

Hover or tap an underlined term to see its definition.

Emergency entrance and ambulance driveway outside Abington Hospital in Pennsylvania, with no people visible
A Pennsylvania hospital represents the health-services side of ADP's combined education-and-health category, which was large enough to keep August's private-payroll estimate above zero. Photo: Dough4872, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

The quick version

  • [ADP estimated](https://mediacenter.adp.com/2026-09-02-ADP-National-Employment-Report-Private-Sector-Employment-Increased-by-38,000-Jobs-in-August) that private employment rose by 38,000 in August, including 45,000 jobs in education and health. Subtracting that category leaves a 7,000-job decline across the other industry groups combined.
  • Weakness was uneven rather than universal. Five of ADP's 10 industry groups lost jobs, while construction, financial activities, leisure and hospitality, and other services also grew. [ADP industry data](https://mediacenter.adp.com/2026-09-02-ADP-National-Employment-Report-Private-Sector-Employment-Increased-by-38,000-Jobs-in-August)
  • Among 42 earlier months in our test, 43 percent of concentration signals were followed by contractions outside education and health, compared with 46 percent of other months. [ADP and BLS series via FRED](https://fred.stlouisfed.org/data/ADPMNUSNERSA)
  • The July BLS estimates imply a 5,000-job gain outside education and health, but the published uncertainty around the two figures used in that subtraction is much larger than 5,000. [BLS July report](https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/empsit_08072026.htm)
  • Verdict: ADP measured a net August contraction outside education and health, but the broader private labor market cannot yet be classified as contracting. The August BLS report is scheduled for September 4 at 8:30 a.m. Eastern. [BLS calendar](https://www.bls.gov/schedule/news_release/empsit.htm)

Figure

Education and health outweighed losses elsewhere

ADP estimated changes in private employment by industry group

Education and health
45
Leisure and hospitality
16
Construction
12
Other gains
12
Other losses
-14
Professional and business
-16
Manufacturing
-17

Other gains combine financial activities and other services. Other losses combine natural resources and mining, trade, transportation and utilities, and information. Use labeled ticks, a prominent zero line and an axis from -20 to 50. All groups except education and health sum to -7.

Source: [ADP National Employment Report](https://mediacenter.adp.com/2026-09-02-ADP-National-Employment-Report-Private-Sector-Employment-Increased-by-38,000-Jobs-in-August) · thousands of jobs · August 2026

Why it matters

Employment growth concentrated in one broad industry group can indicate weaker economic momentum than the headline payroll number suggests, affecting how investors, employers and workers interpret labor demand. The industry-level split is especially relevant to businesses outside education and health, but ADP's estimate and the article's historical test do not establish a broad contraction. The next official BLS payroll release is therefore the immediate confirmation test. https://www.bls.gov/schedule/news_release/empsit.htm

What ADP actually found

By Cumulant Research | September 2, 2026

[ADP's August estimate](https://mediacenter.adp.com/2026-09-02-ADP-National-Employment-Report-Private-Sector-Employment-Increased-by-38,000-Jobs-in-August) says US private employers added a net 38,000 jobs. Education and health servicesEducation and health servicesA broad private-industry group combining educational services with health care and social assistance. [BLS](https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/empsit_08072026.htm) added 45,000. Subtracting the second number from the first leaves a 7,000-job decline across the other nine industry groups combined.

A contribution larger than the total is not a mathematical mistake. Think of a group restaurant bill: one diner can pay more than the final check if another diner receives a refund. Education and health contributed 45,000 jobs, while the gains and losses in the other groups reduced the final increase to 38,000. [ADP industry data](https://mediacenter.adp.com/2026-09-02-ADP-National-Employment-Report-Private-Sector-Employment-Increased-by-38,000-Jobs-in-August)

Figure

Education and health outweighed losses elsewhere

ADP estimated changes in private employment by industry group

Education and health
45
Leisure and hospitality
16
Construction
12
Other gains
12
Other losses
-14
Professional and business
-16
Manufacturing
-17

Other gains combine financial activities and other services. Other losses combine natural resources and mining, trade, transportation and utilities, and information. Use labeled ticks, a prominent zero line and an axis from -20 to 50. All groups except education and health sum to -7.

Source: [ADP National Employment Report](https://mediacenter.adp.com/2026-09-02-ADP-National-Employment-Report-Private-Sector-Employment-Increased-by-38,000-Jobs-in-August) · thousands of jobs · August 2026

The decline was not universal. Construction added 12,000 jobs, leisure and hospitality added 16,000, financial activities added 6,000 and other services added 6,000. Manufacturing lost 17,000, professional and business services lost 16,000, natural resources and mining lost 5,000, trade, transportation and utilities lost 5,000, and information lost 4,000. Five of the 10 industry groups therefore grew and five contracted. [ADP August report](https://mediacenter.adp.com/2026-09-02-ADP-National-Employment-Report-Private-Sector-Employment-Increased-by-38,000-Jobs-in-August)

Verdict

ADP measured exceptionally narrow August job growth and a net decline outside education and health. It did not establish that the entire US private labor market was contracting.

Payroll growth is not the same as hiring

Calling the 7,000 decline a hiring collapse would mix up two measurements. Payroll change is the net result after workers enter and leave payrolls. JOLTSJOLTSThe Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey, which separately estimates openings, hires, quits, layoffs and other departures. [BLS](https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/jolts_09012026.htm) separately counts hires and separations, while ADP estimates the resulting employment level. [BLSBLSThe US Bureau of Labor Statistics, the federal agency that produces the government's monthly Employment Situation and JOLTS reports. [BLS](https://www.bls.gov/bls/empsitquickguide.htm) JOLTS definitions](https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/jolts_09012026.htm)

A bathtub is the useful analogy. Hiring is water entering through the tap, separations are water leaving through the drain, and payroll change is the rise or fall in the water level. A nearly level tub could mean both flows are weak or both are strong.

The freshest direct evidence on those flows predates ADP's August estimate by one month. In July, BLS estimated 7.3 million job openings, 5.1 million hires and 5.1 million total separations. It also estimated 3.1 million quits and 1.7 million layoffs and discharges, describing each national total as little changed. Professional and business services hiring fell by 188,000, but nationwide layoffs did not jump. [BLS July JOLTS](https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/jolts_09012026.htm)

That combination is consistent with a low-hirehireA worker added to an establishment's payroll during the month, including a newly hired or rehired worker. [BLS JOLTS](https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/jolts_09012026.htm), low-fire market in which employers retain many current workers but create relatively few openings. It is not proof of that explanation, and July turnover cannot determine what happened in August. [St. Louis Fed explanation](https://www.stlouisfed.org/on-the-economy/2026/jun/its-still-business-cycle-young-adult-workers-low-hire-low-fire-labor-market)

ADP's weekly tracker also remained positive before the monthly release. Its four-week moving average rose from 8,250 jobs per week through July 25 to 9,500 through August 1 and 11,750 through August 8. Because the windows overlap, those readings cannot be added together as a separate monthly estimate. [ADP NER Pulse](https://mediacenter.adp.com/2026-08-25-ADP-National-Employment-Report-Preliminary-Estimate-for-August-8%2C-2026)

The official July estimate was already close to zero

The latest available BLS payroll report covers July, not August. It estimated that total private payrolls increased by 30,000 while private education and health increased by 25,000. The implied change across the remaining private industries was a gain of 5,000. [BLS July Employment Situation](https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/empsit_08072026.htm)

That is useful continuity but not confirmation. ADP and BLS used different data and measured different months. ADP redesigned its report in 2022 as an independent employment measure rather than a forecast of the BLS result, and the two estimates can diverge in any given month. [ADP methodology](https://www.adpresearch.com/research/how-representative-is-adp-employment-data)

The apparent precision of the 5,000 residualresidualThe amount left after subtraction, here calculated as total private employment minus private education and health employment. is misleading. BLS reported a 90 percent confidence intervalconfidence intervalA range around a sample estimate that communicates statistical uncertainty instead of treating the point estimate as exact. [BLS](https://www.bls.gov/charts/employment-situation/otm-employment-change-by-industry-confidence-intervals.htm) of plus or minus 113,000 around July's 30,000 total-private estimate and plus or minus 51,000 around the 25,000 education-and-health estimate. A valid interval for their difference cannot be obtained by subtracting or simply combining those two margins because the estimates are statistically related. [BLS confidence intervals](https://www.bls.gov/charts/employment-situation/otm-employment-change-by-industry-confidence-intervals.htm)

What July tells us

BLS also placed private job growth outside education and health near zero, but its published uncertainty is too large to treat the 5,000 point estimatepoint estimateThe single best estimate reported from a sample, even though the true value may be higher or lower. as an exact reading.

The historical pattern fails a simple forecasting test

We tested whether ADP concentration months have historically predicted a later contraction. Because ADP retooled the report as an independent measure in 2022, we examined 42 possible signal months from August 2022 through January 2026. January is the last month for which a complete six-month BLS outcome was available by the July 2026 data cutoff. [ADP methodology](https://www.adpresearch.com/research/how-representative-is-adp-employment-data) [ADP and BLS series](https://fred.stlouisfed.org/data/ADPMNUSNERSA)

A month counted as a signal when ADP total private employment increased but education and health increased by more than the total. Seven of the 42 months qualified. For every month, we calculated BLS private employment outside education and health and asked whether that residual was lower three and six months later. [ADP total private](https://fred.stlouisfed.org/data/ADPMNUSNERSA) [ADP education and health](https://fred.stlouisfed.org/data/ADPMINDEDHLTNERSA) [BLS total private](https://fred.stlouisfed.org/data/USPRIV) [BLS education and health](https://fred.stlouisfed.org/data/USEHS)

Figure

The historical signal did not beat the baseline

Share of months followed by a contraction outside education and health

Signal, 3 months
43
Other, 3 months
46
Signal, 6 months
43
Other, 6 months
46

Signal results are 3 contractions among 7 months at each horizon. Other-month results are 16 contractions among 35 months at each horizon. Percentages are rounded. Use a zero-based axis from 0 to 50.

Source: [ADP total private](https://fred.stlouisfed.org/data/ADPMNUSNERSA), [ADP education and health](https://fred.stlouisfed.org/data/ADPMINDEDHLTNERSA), [BLS total private](https://fred.stlouisfed.org/data/USPRIV), [BLS education and health](https://fred.stlouisfed.org/data/USEHS) · percent of months · ADP signal months from August 2022 through January 2026, with BLS outcomes through July 2026

Three of the seven signal months, or 43 percent, were followed by contractions at each horizon. Among the other 35 months, 16, or 46 percent, were followed by contractions. The signal therefore did not outperform the ordinary-month baseline in this sample. The three-percentage-point difference is not meaningful evidence of protection either, given the very small number of signals. [Underlying ADP and BLS series](https://fred.stlouisfed.org/data/ADPMNUSNERSA)

Figure

Seven concentration episodes, seven mixed outcomes

Subsequent BLS private-employment change outside education and health

ADP signal month3-month change6-month change
Sep. 20233117
Apr. 2024-87-247
Aug. 2024-43-61
Feb. 2025-26-185
Oct. 202532123
Dec. 202569165
Jan. 202691109

Exploratory hindsight calculations using current-vintage, seasonally adjusted series available on September 2, 2026. Several outcome windows overlap and therefore are not independent experiments.

Source: [ADP total private](https://fred.stlouisfed.org/data/ADPMNUSNERSA), [ADP education and health](https://fred.stlouisfed.org/data/ADPMINDEDHLTNERSA), [BLS total private](https://fred.stlouisfed.org/data/USPRIV), [BLS education and health](https://fred.stlouisfed.org/data/USEHS) · thousands of jobs · September 2023 through July 2026 outcomes

The individual cases show why the average is inconclusive. The residual fell after the April 2024, August 2024 and February 2025 signals, but rose after the September 2023, October 2025, December 2025 and January 2026 signals. The same three-versus-four split appears at both horizons. [ADP and BLS series](https://fred.stlouisfed.org/data/USPRIV)

The historical pattern identifies poor employment breadth, but it did not predict subsequent contraction better than the baseline.

Why one payroll estimate cannot settle the question

ADP's scale is substantial: its report draws on anonymized weekly payroll information covering more than 26 million private-sector workers. But it begins with a convenience sampleconvenience sampleA sample assembled from available participants, such as ADP clients, rather than employers randomly selected from the entire economy. [ADP methodology](https://www.adpresearch.com/research/how-representative-is-adp-employment-data) of ADP clients rather than a random census of every employer. ADP says its sample leans toward larger establishments, manufacturing and the Northeast. [ADP report](https://mediacenter.adp.com/2026-09-02-ADP-National-Employment-Report-Private-Sector-Employment-Increased-by-38,000-Jobs-in-August) [ADP methodology](https://www.adpresearch.com/research/how-representative-is-adp-employment-data)

ADP reweights its observations by industry, state and employer size using QCEWQCEWThe Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages, an administrative count covering more than 95 percent of US jobs. [BLS](https://www.bls.gov/cew/overview.htm) records. That adjustment addresses differences the model can observe, but it does not turn the sample into a complete census or eliminate monthly estimation error. [ADP methodology](https://www.adpresearch.com/research/how-representative-is-adp-employment-data)

The more comprehensive QCEW records also arrive too late to answer an immediate news question. QCEW covers more than 95 percent of US jobs, but ADP notes that the data are released five or six months after a quarter ends. [BLS QCEW overview](https://www.bls.gov/cew/overview.htm) [ADP methodology](https://www.adpresearch.com/research/how-representative-is-adp-employment-data)

Recent benchmark evidence illustrates the revision risk. On August 28, BLS estimated that its March 2026 total-private employment level would eventually be revised down by 178,000, including a 96,000 downward revision in private education and health. The implied adjustment outside that category is 82,000 downward. This concerns the March employment level, not jobs lost in August, and BLS said the final revision would enter the official estimates in February 2027. [BLS benchmark summary](https://www.bls.gov/news.release/prebmk.nr0.htm) [BLS benchmark table](https://www.bls.gov/news.release/prebmk.t01.htm)

ADP also publishes education and health as one combined group. Its August table cannot show how the 45,000 gain was divided among private schools, health-care providers and social-assistance organizations. [ADP industry table](https://mediacenter.adp.com/2026-09-02-ADP-National-Employment-Report-Private-Sector-Employment-Increased-by-38,000-Jobs-in-August)

What would corroborate the warning

The August BLS Employment Situation is scheduled for September 4 at 8:30 a.m. Eastern. It will provide the first independent monthly payroll estimate covering the same period as ADP's August report. [BLS release calendar](https://www.bls.gov/schedule/news_release/empsit.htm)

  • Corroborated, BLS private employment outside education and health is zero or negative, and at least five of the nine other comparable industry groups are flat or declining.
  • Not corroborated, The BLS residual is positive and most of the other comparable industry groups expand.
  • Mixed, The total residual and the industry count point in opposite directions.

This decision rule is prospective: it was set before the BLS release so the interpretation cannot be rewritten after the result is known. Even a corroborating first estimate would remain preliminary because BLS revises monthly payroll estimates as additional employer reports arrive and later benchmarks the series to QCEW records. [BLS methods](https://www.bls.gov/bls/empsitquickguide.htm)

No market move can substitute for that economic evidence. A price change after the ADP release would show how traders repriced the news, not whether employment outside education and health actually contracted.

Conclusion

The narrow answer is yes within ADP's August estimate: 38,000 total private jobs minus 45,000 in education and health equals a 7,000 decline across the other industry groups combined. Five of those nine groups declined and four grew. [ADP August report](https://mediacenter.adp.com/2026-09-02-ADP-National-Employment-Report-Private-Sector-Employment-Increased-by-38,000-Jobs-in-August)

The broader answer is not yet. July's BLS residual was near zero but highly uncertain, July turnover data did not show a national surge in layoffs, and the historical concentration signal failed to beat a simple baselinebaselineThe comparison result used to judge whether a signal performs better than an ordinary month.. [BLS July report](https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/empsit_08072026.htm) [BLS JOLTS](https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/jolts_09012026.htm) [Historical series](https://fred.stlouisfed.org/data/ADPMNUSNERSA)

The defensible finding is therefore limited but consequential: ADP recorded an August contraction outside education and health, revealing unusually narrow employment growth. The evidence does not yet prove that the wider private labor market entered a sustained contraction.

What to watch

  • Whether the September 4 BLS report confirms an August decline in private employment outside education and health. https://www.bls.gov/schedule/news_release/empsit.htm
  • Whether weakness spreads beyond the five ADP industry groups that lost jobs in August. https://mediacenter.adp.com/2026-09-02-ADP-National-Employment-Report-Private-Sector-Employment-Increased-by-38,000-Jobs-in-August
  • Whether subsequent JOLTS data show falling hires, rising layoffs or both. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/jolts_09012026.htm
  • How later revisions and the February 2027 benchmark update change the apparent breadth of private employment growth. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/prebmk.nr0.htm

How we did this

  • Reporting and data cutoff: September 2, 2026. The analysis uses information available by that date and does not incorporate the unreleased August BLS Employment Situation.
  • We calculated ADP employment outside education and health as the reported total-private monthly change minus the education-and-health monthly change. For August, 38,000 minus 45,000 equals -7,000. [ADP](https://mediacenter.adp.com/2026-09-02-ADP-National-Employment-Report-Private-Sector-Employment-Increased-by-38,000-Jobs-in-August)
  • The lead chart preserves every ADP industry value while combining two small positive categories and three small negative categories to keep the display below eight bars. The combinations are disclosed in the chart note. [ADP industry table](https://mediacenter.adp.com/2026-09-02-ADP-National-Employment-Report-Private-Sector-Employment-Increased-by-38,000-Jobs-in-August)
  • For the historical test, we examined 42 potential signal months from August 2022 through January 2026. A signal required positive ADP total-private growth and a larger increase in ADP education and health. [ADP total](https://fred.stlouisfed.org/data/ADPMNUSNERSA) [ADP education and health](https://fred.stlouisfed.org/data/ADPMINDEDHLTNERSA)
  • For each potential signal month, we calculated BLS private employment outside education and health as USPRIV minus USEHS, then measured whether that residual was lower three and six months later. [BLS total private](https://fred.stlouisfed.org/data/USPRIV) [BLS education and health](https://fred.stlouisfed.org/data/USEHS)
  • Seven months met the signal rule and 35 did not. Three of seven signal months and 16 of 35 other months were followed by contractions at each horizon, producing rounded rates of 43 percent and 46 percent.
  • The historical analysis uses the latest revised series available at the cutoff. It is a hindsight comparison, not a real-time backtest or a statistical model.
  • We did not calculate a confidence interval for July's BLS residual because the published table does not provide the statistical relationship needed to derive uncertainty around the difference correctly. [BLS confidence intervals](https://www.bls.gov/charts/employment-situation/otm-employment-change-by-industry-confidence-intervals.htm)
  • The prospective corroboration rule was fixed before the September 4 BLS release: a nonpositive residual plus at least five of nine other comparable industry groups flat or declining corroborates the warning; a positive residual with expansion in most groups does not; conflicting evidence is classified as mixed.

What this cannot establish

  • ADP's August result is an estimate from one payroll provider rather than a census or the official BLS result. [ADP methodology](https://www.adpresearch.com/research/how-representative-is-adp-employment-data)
  • ADP combines private education and health services, preventing a reliable split among education, health care and social assistance. [ADP](https://mediacenter.adp.com/2026-09-02-ADP-National-Employment-Report-Private-Sector-Employment-Increased-by-38,000-Jobs-in-August)
  • The historical test contains only seven signal months, and several three-month and six-month outcome windows overlap.
  • The baseline window begins with ADP's 2022 redesign, so it does not span multiple complete business cycles. [ADP methodology](https://www.adpresearch.com/research/how-representative-is-adp-employment-data)
  • The historical calculations use revised current-vintage data rather than the exact estimates available to readers on each original release date.
  • The historical comparison is descriptive and too small to establish statistical significance, causation or a dependable forecasting model.
  • Sampling uncertainty is large relative to July's 5,000 BLS residual, and the published confidence-interval table does not permit a valid interval for that subtraction. [BLS confidence intervals](https://www.bls.gov/charts/employment-situation/otm-employment-change-by-industry-confidence-intervals.htm)
  • QCEW benchmark records arrive with a substantial delay, so the most comprehensive confirmation is unavailable for immediate interpretation. [BLS QCEW](https://www.bls.gov/cew/overview.htm)

This is AI-assisted analysis under stated assumptions; it is not investment advice or a price target. Figures are as of the publication date and trace to the cited sources; markets and disclosures change.

US economylabor marketemploymentADPBLSdata journalismus-employmentadp-private-payrollsADPUnited States

Related

Labor

Reuters' 9,000 Porsche figure includes 2,000 contracts that had already ended

Porsche's supervisory board supported a new restructuring initiative on July 22, 2026, but the company did not disclose its size. The public record shows that Reuters' reported 9,000 total mixes completed departures with possible future reductions, leaving the company-confirmed balance unknown and a media-based ceiling of about 6,900. [Reuters](https://live.euronext.com/en/financial-news/porsche-supervisory-board-backs-tougher-restructuring) [Tagesschau/SWR](https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/regional/badenwuerttemberg/swr-porsche-will-wohl-4-000-weitere-stellen-abbauen-100.html)

Exterior of Porsche Werk 2 buildings at Porscheplatz in Stuttgart-Zuffenhausen, Germany.
Labor

June's Jobless Rate Fell to 4.2% While Employment Dropped 507,000: The Improvement Is an Exit, Not a Hire

On 2 July the U.S. unemployment rate fell to a one-year low of 4.2%, yet the same household survey showed employment down about 507,000 and the labor force down about 720,000. The arithmetic is airtight: the rate fell because the count shrank, not because the jobless found work. Who left and why is far less settled, and that gap matters because the Federal Reserve and markets mostly read the headline.

June's Jobless Rate Fell to 4.2% While Employment Dropped 507,000: The Improvement Is an Exit, Not a Hire
Labor

The IRS explained the paid-leave premium method. It did not expand worker eligibility

On August 5, 2026, the IRS told employers how to calculate the Section 45S credit using paid-leave insurance premiums. A comparison of the [notice](https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n-26-28.pdf), the [2025 law](https://www.congress.gov/119/plaws/publ21/PLAW-119publ21.pdf) and the [current tax code](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?edition=prelim&num=0&req=granuleid%3AUSC-prelim-title26-section45S) shows that the IRS clarified the claiming process but did not widen the worker eligibility rules.

Stone sign reading Department of the Treasury and Internal Revenue Service outside the IRS building in Washington, D.C.
Labor

The H-1B worker pool shrank by at least 124,553, but public data cannot say why

USCIS reported 211,600 properly submitted FY2027 registrations, 38.5% fewer than the prior year. The published counts prove that the pool contained at least 124,553 fewer prospective workers, but they cannot separate any effect of the disputed $100,000 payment policy from the wage-weighted lottery, labor demand or other forces.

An anonymized United States visa specimen with identifying details removed.